Firm Libraries & Sea Change

May 7, 2009

Yesterday, I had the pleasure of spending some time with an old colleague.  We discussed how the economic downturn was forcing transformations in law firms.  Traditionally law firms are slow to change and usually do so only when circumstances force their hands.

Law firm libraries are a part of the trend of downsizing.  This colleague stated that while the library budget had not been cut staff had been cut.  The result was that the budget was cut because staff efficiencies were forcing the reduction of personal copies.  I find it interesting that the current economic crunch is succeeding in implementing a sea change in collection development and library services within some firms.

Statutes and rule books are popular titles for “personal copies.”   Firms that provide “personal copies” generally also have Westlaw and/or Lexis.  The information contained within the personal copies is available through various electronic resources and is more current.

Firm librarians know that these “personal copies” are a significant line item in budgets.  The material is duplicative and a convenience rather than a necessity.  The personal copies require staff time to process.

Cutting “personal copies” reduces costs and forces attorneys to use the electronic resources that are a permanent part of firm services.  These electronic resources are another part of the sea change.

Many firms bill back the costs on online research.  As clients continue to look for ways to cut their owns costs the push back on billing electronic research costs will continue to grow.

Firms did not bill for print collections and clients know that fact.  Some specialty technical reports may have occassionally been billed to clients but standard resources used to support the firm’s work were not.  As firms de-duplicate their collections and improve efficiencies by maximizing use of available electronic resources they are, or at least should be, reconsidering the practice of online research bill backs.

Bill backs take staff time and like the personal copies, efficiencies can be improved by changing this tradition.  Corporate clients are saavy and expect value added service not line item charges.

Smart firms will embrace this sea change and maximize the value of their professional library staff through project and/or hourly billing.  Firms should consider the experience and educational level of their information professionals and set billing rates at a proper reflective rates.  Does a one-year associate really research more efficiently than a five year or even first year librarian?

Marketing the value-added efficient service provided by your firm librarians is a must for firms who wish to transform client services.  Firms who wish to survive should consider implementing the sea change of using the firm librarians as a major selling point for high quality and efficient service sooner rather than later.

Constance Ard May 7, 2009


De-Duplication

April 17, 2009

As a firm librarian, one of the first things I came to understand was the importance of having primary research sources in duplicate formats.  That was in 1996.  In 2008 it was still important but the financial realities were beginning to impact the ability to keep items in duplicate formats.   Today I suspect this is a critical mission in law firm collection development for those who have not already conquered the resistance.

Those of you in the legal world understand that by duplicate formats I mean that regulations, statutes and favorite treatises may be available in print (including multiple copies), available through the WEXIS databases and maybe even available as a separate electronic subscription for just that title.  This doesn’t even include the “free” materials made available on the Internet by the government.

Those of you not familiar with the legal world may say why?  The reality is that in law firms time is money and if a researcher i.e. an attorney uses a resources regularly in a particular format they expect to continue to be able to do so no matter how developed other access may be.

Of course the struggle is that these duplicate formats impact the budget.  It’s easy to take a line-item view of the budget and see where cuts can be made.  Not taking the users into account makes it easy to save money.  When you stop to consider the users the decisions become difficult.

So, now the economy is tight and is affecting law firms with staff and associate lay-offs.  Travel money has been cut and other law firm amenties may be gone.  Yet still more money needs to be saved.  How can you balance the need to cut the budget and satisfy the user with an obvious choice like duplicate materials?

The easy answer is just make the cut.  As a library director or manager, it’s your responsibility to make collection decisions that support the firm’s work and meets budget.  However, if you wish to continue to make sure that attorneys can answer client questions you need to do more than make the cut.

Duplicate materials also come in the form of general reference sources that are bought in multiples for the heavy users.  Reducing those numbers is a good 2nd step.  Of course, to do it successfully you must communicate with the users what’s going to happen, why and how they will be able to get the material when they need it at midnight when you are long gone from the office.

A 3rd step is using training as a conversion tool.  If you can get your long-time print users comfortable with the electronic version then deleting the print from your collection will be easier.  Some attorneys who may be comfortable with searching case-law on-line may still be resistant to using the regulations in an electronic format.  (Remember time is money?)  They may say that it takes more time to use an electronic resource.  Your job is to get them so comfortable with the electronic version through training that they become even more efficient with the electronic version.

You may be thinking, Answer Maven why are you focusing on de-duplication through a concentration on electronic formats?  Print materials take time and staff to update.  Multiple print copies of materials are more difficult to manage.  If you have an electronic source you already have it licensed for multiple users, even transitionary users such as interns and summer associates.  This reduces the need to buy one more copy of the rules for that short-term person.

In essence, you will get more bang for you buck through the flexibility of electronic resources.  So when it comes time to de-dupe your collection think about communication with users and training as your keys to success.

Constance Ard April 17, 2009


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 246 other followers