Educating Information Users on Verification and Validity

September 24, 2009

I’ve been thinking a bit about he role of librarians in educating information users.  As you all know, we operate in an interactive global information environment.  Information is everywhere and not every one who finds it realizes the ease of adding information to the world wide web and the nature of that information.

The things I learned from Ms. Garner and Ms. Roy in elementary school library skills classes have stood me well.  Now I can’t remember exactly where and when I needed to use the “right” sources but I knew that the library would always guide me to the “right” sources.

Earlier this week I participated in a focus group about the Kentucky Virtual Library and one of my fellow participants spent some time discussing the ideas around how K-12 students learn how to use online sources.  The curriculum is there for some source verification but is it enough.

From the other end of the spectrum, librarians that support information workers in the corporate world are still educating users about finding and relying on information from verifiable reliable sources.  I remember a particular instance where all the librarians I was working with got on the same soapbox at the same time when we realized that some shoddy research and shoddy sources were being used on a major project.  We immediately took up the mantle of educating that researcher on the difference between good information and information that bored and angry Joe the construction worker can upload and tout as correct.

Educating end-users will always be a part of the knowledge workplace.  I just think that the right curriculum repeated throughout the formal education process just gives the work-place educator a stronger foundation to build upon. 

Savvy users and information professionals will always struggle against the idea that what you find easily is the best and only source out there.  Basic skills are the only weapons that can be used to disarm this reliance on keyword searching and retrieval of optimized for search engine content. 

Constance Ard September 24, 2009


More Press for PACER Petition and Zakta

September 23, 2009

Being a librarian I tend towards collecting and disseminating information that I think will be useful or of interest to my clients.  I did this when I worked at the law firm and it’s one of the activities that I don’t get to indulge in as much as I used to.  So bear with me gentle reader as I “share” information about some of my past blog topics and snippets of things I think you might find interesting.  Pretend its your very own, undefined special delivery news alert.

Social networking meets law students:  Networking tools aimed at the law school demographic are described here.

FastCase is now available to members of the Oregon Bar.  See the news story here.

It looks like the PACER petition got its required signatures and has been submitted to the powers that be.  Read more about it here.

Zakta.com that interesting new search engine that I mentioned last week has a further analysis from social media guru Jason Falls.

Constance Ard September 23, 2009


Protect the Librarians: Part II

August 22, 2009

In my last post I discussed the need to protect librarians due to the continued growth of complex information.  Today, I want to talk about my views about librarians as professionals.

Librarians are part of a noble profession in some views.  Collecting, organizing and making accessible our cultural, literary and historical records is indeed critical.  Providing access to data necessary for operating in today’s knowledge age is also hugely important.

These facts alone do not place librarians in an infallible place upon a golden pedestal.  It is our responsibility to learn, advocate, and earn our status as important providers of information.

Those of us who do not continue to learn and evolve in our service do not necessarily deserve a protected place in the business of information.  Those of us who do continuously learn and improve our services can’t rest on those accomplishments alone.

No one knows what we do better than ourselves.  I often tell my colleagues that too often expend energy advocating ourselves to fellow librarians.  It is my firm belief that what we must do is tell our lawyers, administrators, doctors, faculty members and CEO’s how important we are and follow it up with specifics on why we are important.

We must also explain how we contribute to an organization’s mission and bottom-line.  People have a difficult time understanding just what librarians do.  They know librarians are good guys but only a few know specifically why.    Without specifics, how can we expect a CEO to know that understanding when and how to use a commercial database is appropriate?   We know that when the marketing director calls us at 9 a.m. to prepare a marketing report for a lunchtime briefing fast and good is better than thorough and free is the only option.

Librarians must be specific and direct.  It is never appropriate to say “No problem” when this type of project is completed and delivered.  It is absolutely appropriate for you to say in response to the Thank You:  “You are quite welcome, with our XYZ resource we are able to meet these tight deadlines.”

Also, assertiveness is not a bad trait.  C-level executives are assertive and admired for the trait.   Recently I was given a great compliment:  “You’re nice, but you still are decisive and when you have an important point to make during a meeting you do so.”

If librarians want to be protected, they must begin by protecting themselves.  So if you are not being assertive when the occasion calls for it and you are not advocating for the resources you need to successfully do your job and you are not clearly communicating why you and the entire library staff must be a partner in the knowledge culture for successful business;  then who will?

Constance Ard August 22, 2009


Louisville Free Public Library Floods & You Can Help

August 5, 2009

My colleague Sarah Glassmeyer has eloquently related the tragedy that hit Louisville Free Public Library during yesterday’s flash flooding.    Her post provides links to ways that you can donate to the library and even the Humane Society.

I am thankful that my place is safe and dry and I’m a bit nervous about serving the damage in person.  I will be doing my part to help out my hometown and I hope my readers will do the same.

Constance Ard August 4, 2009


Ulla de Stricker: Award Winner

April 7, 2009

I’m proud to share this post by Stephen Arnold who states very eloquently some of the wonders of Ulla de Stricker who recently won the AIIP Sue Rugge Memorial Award.

During the past several years Ulla has been a mentor and advisor to me.  I hope to continue to learn from her and look forward to the opportunity to work with her in the years to come.

Ulla truly embodies the spirit of the Sue Rugge Award because she does reach out to new independent information professionals with encouragement and inspiration.  I count myself lucky to be one of those IIP’s that Ulla nourishes.

Constance Ard April 7, 2009


Usage Up, Budgets Down

March 21, 2009

The news is filled with a secret that long-time library users have known… “you can get really great stuff without paying for it.”

That great stuff includes music, videos and/or DVDs, books, computer access, and not just Internet but high quality, commercial databases that offer a wealth of electronic information.  Stephen Arnold provides a really insightful commentary on this issue.

The reality is that libraries, at least public and state-funded academic libraries here in Kentucky have been facing the budget crunch Mr. Arnold mentions, for about a year now.  Last year the Kentucky Virtual Library faced some serious choices of what to keep and what to sacrifice in order to provide the most comprehensive and affordable support to the electronic information wealth of the state.

The commercial providers of these resources were aware of the budget crunch and remain so. They realize that negotiations must be flexible and that it is better to retain current customers at a reduced subscription level, than to have no customer.  I fear that this trend will continue for the next several years unless some thought is given to investing in the intellectual capital that libraries provide.

Since budget shortfalls are the norm of the day in Kentucky and other states why not think about information services and access to electronic services as part of the economic stimulus map?  Now, I don’t know all the projects that are being funded, but if funding for library services is part of the stimulus it’s certainly not making the news.

What is making the news is the increased usage of libraries.  And while no shovel is required, helping to maintain the funding for important electronic resources such as those provided by KYVL would certainly seem to be an appropriate use of funds.  Average Joe’s who are attempting to beef up their computer skills, search for jobs or just provide reading and leisure materials to their families on a ever tighter home budget are already walking into the library more often.  They are using services they probably didn’t  even know were available at this time last year and once you are a library user, you rarely stop.

The demand for these resources will continue to increase and in the law of supply and demand, libraries are,  or soon will be, unable to meet the demand due to the budget crunch.  The suppliers must be considered.

Commercial vendors such as those mentioned in the above referenced Beyond Search post are an important part of the intellectual capital of society.  Google very well may be the wave of the future in this sector of content supply.  But for the here and now, let’s think about ways to sustain and increase the funding of our public information institutions.  Without educational resources and information access how can human intellectual capital grow?  And without human intellectual capital how can anything improve?


Information Technology a Social Justice Issue?

March 12, 2009

Normally, I don’t like to mix my volunteer activities with this business.  However, on occasion I am reminded that life always mixes even when we least expect it.

Sunday March 8 was International Women’s Day.  I attended an event at the University of Kentucky WT Young Library:  Women’s Health is a Social Justice Issue.  As you would expect health as a social justice issue was part and parcel of the conversation.  What I did not expect was the speaker, Loretta J. Ross, founder and National Coordinator of SisterSong , to bring Information Technology into the conversation.

As Ms. Ross discussed the major issues she considered to be social justice issues she threw Information Technology into the mix.  I did a double take and during the Q&A session asked for an elaboration.  What exactly about IT is a social justice issue?  She began by reminding me of things I knew:  access and ability to use IT hardware and software are important.   The conversation did not stop there.  She elaborated on the privacy issues that were emerging, especially as it related to medical information.  The conversation on this issue concluded with an even deeper look at IT access based upon the health of the electrical grid.

I ended up leaving this event with a new perspective on IT.  Beyond the technical details and the concerns that I have had about access, my concerns and interest now include the sustainability of the power grid, the need for greater broadband access and a continuing dedication to the advancement and security of electronic medical information.

Knowing that conversations about IT are making their way to the advocacy environment reiterates our need to think broadly about security issues as well as access to not just information but to the sources of locating that information, whether it be historical newspapers or electronic publications that never see print.

Constance Ard March 12, 2009


Slaying the Giant – Governemnt Information Access

March 2, 2009

Carl Malamud has led a long hard fight against the processes of government information production.  Until reading this post I had not realized the benefits I received from Mr. Malamud’s crusade.

His passion is the ready access to government produced information.  The latest endeavor was access to case law.  Now his fight is more strategic.  He is lobbying to get assigned as the public printer of the United States.  In this role he would direct the US Government Printing Office.  According to Mr. Ambrogi’s post, Mr. Malamud already has powerful backers.  What is more impressive to me is his clear strategy that addresses who publishes case law, how GPO data is presented on the Internet across agencies and provide greater transparency for the GPO itself.

Having succeeded with the SEC database publication of data which resulted in EDGAR, I think Mr. Malamud’s track record makes him an attractive candidate.  If he succeeds in getting the job, tracking his success will no doubt be easy to do.  For now, check out public.resource.org to find out just what goes on behind the scenes in getting access to publicly available information.  As it stands there is access but usability is questionable for some areas.  If Malamud directs the efforts of the GPO, I feel confident that access and usability will improve.  Perhaps not across the board but then again the government is giant it will take persistence to dress it down once the slaughter is complete.

Constance Ard March 2, 2009


“Can’t Get No Satisfaction”

December 16, 2008

Unlike the Rolling Stones, your clients can get satisfaction if you take the time and effort to honestly assess their needs.

There is a lot of literature out there telling us what law firms are doing wrong when it comes to relationships with in-house counsel, but this article provides some great tips on getting it right.

A few key take-aways to keep in mind for universal client service.

Communication is critical.

  • Providing the why behind an unusually large charge, or an unexpected answer goes a long way to keeping your client.
  • Communicating in the client’s preferred method saves frustration.

Relationships matter.

  • Continual service and quality interactions build loyalty.
  • Personal builds business.

Sure these are simple mantras but simplicity works when you are working on complicated matters.  Knowing your client’s needs and preferences and responding appropriately, satisfies the client.


The End of Lawyers?

November 11, 2008

This interview with Richard Susskind causes one to stop and think deeply about the Future of Law.  The analysis and predictions summarized in the interview about Susskind’s latest book bring to the forefront some long term concerns.  These theories and thoughts that have been on the minds of legal professionals for years without substantive preventive actions.   Actions necessary for the continued cultural and economic success of the legal industry which commoditization and technology advances threaten.

In-house counsel concerns dominate big firm business.  Big firms have not invested enough thought and strategic planning into knowledge management to assure in-house counselors of a readiness to meet the demands caused by the demands of electronically stored information.  In-house law departments don’t have the resources necessary to meet the technical demands of today’s legal business environment.  Offering a comprehensive, strategic approach to ESI would be a powerful competitive edge.

The telling quote for me from this interview is this comparison between UK and US firms.

The latter have invested more, for example, in knowledge management and in online legal services. Understandably, the best of the US firms have not yet seen why they should bother. Business has been very good without that stuff, thank you very much.

Today’s credit crunch and the demands of in-house counsel to cut costs and deliver high service means that business as usual will not cut it any more.  Innovations will become standard operating procedures.  Firms should begin to implement strategies that will keep them as a key service provider to their bread and butter corporate clients.

Strategies related to records management for ESI, e-discovery response, and environmental sustainability will increase in importance.   Firms that provide protection to corporations on those fronts will be the firms that survive the future of law.

One more interesting note about this interview caught my attention.  For now, it’s impact is limited to the UK but Susskind briefly touched on the “Legal Services Act“  that will allow “alternative business structures” for the legal services industry.  Susskind predicts that the co-mingling of non-lawyers and lawyers in the legal services industry will increase in importance and the future of “new-look” services.  I predict that the US will continue to to wrestle with alternative services as well and that the co-mingling here will be a struggle that esteemed attorneys will reluctantly embrace.  Alternative businesses to-date have been a mostly attorney only industry and that may have led to some missed opportunities.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 246 other followers